Optimizing the urban mining: A mathematical modelling strategy based on sustainable practices

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66210/ijmri.26.01.001

Keywords:

E waste, sustainability, global optimization, urban mining, mathematical model, circular economy

Abstract

Urban mining, the process of recovering valuable materials from anthropogenic waste streams such as electronic waste (e-waste), buildings, presents a critical pathway toward sustainable resource management in the face of escalating global resource depletion and environmental degradation. This paper develops a mathematical modelling strategy to optimize urban mining operations, integrating economic, environmental, and social sustainability dimensions. Drawing on global e-waste data indicating 62 million tonnes generated in 2022, with projections reaching 82 million tonnes by 2030, we propose a TOPSIS Framework model that maximizes sustainable value defined as recovered material revenue minus processing costs plus environmental benefits while adhering to capacity and availability constraints. The objective is to enhance recovery efficiency, hypothesizing that optimized modelling can increase resource recovery rates by up to 30% compared to traditional methods. Through a simulated case study, the model demonstrates optimal allocation of processing efforts across e-waste categories, yielding a sustainable value of $8,595,000 for a hypothetical 2,500-ton facility. This approach underscores the promise of urban mining in reducing reliance on primary mining, conserving natural resources, and mitigating environmental impacts, while addressing limits such as complex waste streams and regulatory barriers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & Murtaza, Q. (2016). Prioritizing critical success factors for reverse logistics implementation using fuzzy-TOPSIS methodology. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 12(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-015-0124-8

Alshaikh, R., & Abdelfatah, A. (2024). Optimization Techniques in Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 16(15), 6585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156585

Asefi, H., & Lim, S. (2017). A novel multi-dimensional modeling approach to integrated municipal solid waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.061

Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122263

Ghulam, S. T., & Abushammala, H. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities in the Management of Electronic Waste and Its Impact on Human Health and Environment. Sustainability, 15(3), 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031837

Govind Kharat, Manoj, Murthy, S., Jaisingh Kamble, S., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Govind Kharat, Mukesh. (2019). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis for environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection. Technology in Society, 57, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.005

Goyal, S., & Gupta, S. (2024). A comprehensive review of current techniques, issues, and technological advancements in sustainable E-waste management. E-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 9, 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100702

Liu, K., Tan, Q., Yu, J., & Wang, M. (2023). A global perspective on e-waste recycling. Circular Economy, 2(1), 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2023.100028

Mayanti, B., Songok, J., & Helo, P. (2021). Multi-objective optimization to improve energy, economic and, environmental life cycle assessment in waste-to-energy plant. Waste Management, 127, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.042

Ouro-Salim, O. (2024). Urban mining of e-waste management globally: Literature review. In Cleaner Waste Systems (Vol. 9). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100162

Qadir, A., Abdullah, S., Khan, S., & Khan, F. (2024). A New Extended Topsis Method for E-Waste Recycling Partner Selection Under Complex Pythagorean Fuzzy Rough Dombi Aggregation Operator. IEEE Access, 12, 193520–193551. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3338446

Rautela, R., Arya, S., Vishwakarma, S., Lee, J., Kim, K.-H., & Kumar, S. (2021). E-waste management and its effects on the environment and human health. Science of The Total Environment, 773, 145623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145623

Selvakanmani, S., Rajeswari, P., Krishna, B. V., & Manikandan, J. (2024). Optimizing E-waste management: Deep learning classifiers for effective planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 141021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141021

Shahabuddin, M., Uddin, M. Nur, Chowdhury, J. I., Ahmed, S. F., Uddin, M. N., Mofijur, M., & Uddin, M. A. (2023). A review of the recent development, challenges, and opportunities of electronic waste (e-waste). In International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (Vol. 20, Number 4, pp. 4513–4520). Institute for Ionics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04274-w

Xavier, L. H., Giese, E. C., Ribeiro-Duthie, A. C., & Lins, F. A. F. (2021). Sustainability and the circular economy: A theoretical approach focused on e-waste urban mining. Resources Policy, 74, 101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101467

Downloads

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

Optimizing the urban mining: A mathematical modelling strategy based on sustainable practices. (2026). International Journal of Management Research & Innovation, 1(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.66210/ijmri.26.01.001